Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-08-01 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Metal | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A6 is a bit better than the Moto G5S Plus, getting a global score of 75.8 against 74.8. Galaxy A6's design is newer, a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Moto G5S Plus. Motorola Moto G5S Plus counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A6, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density and a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920.
Motorola Moto G5S Plus features a slightly bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A6, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds 272 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Moto G5S Plus has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G5S Plus also has 1 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy A6's battery life is just as good as Moto G5S Plus's battery performance. The Motorola Moto G5S Plus captures a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing images or video in low-light situations and a less megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video definition.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Samsung Galaxy A6 is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.