Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-08-01 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2017) is a little bit better than Moto G5S Plus, having a 75.8 score against 74.8. The Galaxy A7 (2017) construction is somewhat thinner but a little heavier than Moto G5S Plus, and both of them were released with only 7 months difference. The Moto G5S Plus counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Moto G5S Plus also has more RAM memory.
Moto G5S Plus counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 1920, the Moto G5S Plus also counts with a bit better pixel number per inch of display. Motorola Moto G5S Plus captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse 13 mega pixels resolution and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way higher video quality.
The Moto G5S Plus counts with a better storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows 128 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A7 (2017) has improved battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has a 3600mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.