Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-08-01 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A70 has an overall score of 76.9, which is a bit better than the Moto G5S Plus's 74.8 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A70 construction is newer and thinner than the Moto G5S Plus's, although it is also just a little heavier. Galaxy A70 has a little faster processor than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A70 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A70 has a display that is just as good as the Moto G5S Plus one, because although the Galaxy A70 has a bit inferior pixel quantity per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G5S Plus, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A70 has a really longer battery lifetime than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3000mAh. The Moto G5S Plus features a very superior camera than Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for taking pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate.
Although Galaxy A70 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G5S Plus. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.