Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-01 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 is much better than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, getting a score of 87.5 against 74.8. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A71 is a bit heavier than the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, it's somewhat thinner and also extremely newer. Samsung Galaxy A71 features a display that is just as good as the screen in Moto G5S Plus, because although the Samsung Galaxy A71 has a just a bit lower display density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a little bit better performance than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy A71 takes greater videos and photos than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 also has a larger aperture and a back facing camera with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A71 has a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB and 64 GB more internal storage. Galaxy A71 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy A71 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G5S Plus. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.