Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-01 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Prism bricks black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is a lot better than Motorola Moto G5S Plus's 74.8 score. The Galaxy A71 5G UW design is much newer and thinner than Motorola Moto G5S Plus's, but it is somewhat heavier. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a quite worse number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little faster processing unit than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has a 50% more battery capacity. The Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots much clearer photos and videos than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a camera with much more MP and a larger aperture to capture better photography and video in low light environments.
Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G5S Plus. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, else you can save some dollars and get the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.