Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-08-01 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 144.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G5S Plus's 74.8 overall score. Samsung Galaxy Fold's construction is incredibly newer and way thinner, but extremely heavier than the Motorola Moto G5S Plus. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a screen that's just as good as the Motorola Moto G5S Plus one, because although the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a better 1536 x 2152 resolution and a really bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit better processing unit than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Fold takes slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a lower 12 MP resolution camera and a worse video resolution, it also counts with a way bigger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited environments.
Galaxy Fold features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory. Galaxy Fold features a much better battery performance than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a 46% larger battery size.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G5S Plus. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Fold, else you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.