Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2017-08-01 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 144.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M20 has a score of 78.9, which is a bit better than the Moto G5S Plus's 74.8 general score. Even though Samsung Galaxy M20 is a little bit heavier than the Moto G5S Plus, it's just a little thinner and also newer. The Motorola Moto G5S Plus counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy M20. They have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy M20 has a screen that is very similar to the Moto G5S Plus one, although the Galaxy M20 also has a quite greater count of pixels per inch of screen, a bit bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. Galaxy M20 has more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy M20 also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Moto G5S Plus shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking photos or video in low-light environments, and they both have a same resolution back camera, the Moto G5S Plus also counts with a much better (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy M20 has a superior battery performance than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a 67% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.