Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-01 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Black and White |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 is better than the Moto G5S Plus, having a general score of 87.7 against 74.8. The Samsung Galaxy M51 body has the same thickness than Moto G5S Plus, but it is much heavier. The Galaxy M51 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy M51 also has more RAM.
Galaxy M51 counts with a screen that is just as good as the Moto G5S Plus one, because although the Galaxy M51 has a bit lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a larger display. The Galaxy M51 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy M51 also has a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photos and videos and a camera with much more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M51 features a much longer battery life than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a 133 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.