Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-08-01 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is way better than the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, getting a overall score of 90.8 against 74.8. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a incredibly newer and somewhat thinner device than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, although it is also heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a just a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a little bit better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a superior battery performance than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 captures much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a less mega pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low light captures and video and a much better video resolution.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G5S Plus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G5S Plus. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Moto G5S Plus, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.