Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-01 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G5S Plus's global score of 74.8. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is noticeably newer and thinner, but heavier than the Motorola Moto G5S Plus. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little sharper screen than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a larger display, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a bit better pixels density. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes greater photographs and videos than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a larger camera aperture to capture better low light images and video and a camera with a much higher 108 MP resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Moto G5S Plus, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better battery performance than Moto G5S Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G5S Plus. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.