Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2017-08-01 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 81.2, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G5S Plus's global score of 74.8. Samsung Galaxy Note 3's body has the same weight than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, but it's thinner. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a little better performance than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processor.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a brighter display than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a just a little lower pixel amount per screen inch, and they both have the same 1920 x 1080 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a little bit bigger screen. The Motorola Moto G5S Plus counts with a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G5S Plus also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 128 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures in poorly lited situations, they both have a 13 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy Note 3 features just a bit better battery life than Moto G5S Plus, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto G5S Plus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G5S Plus. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Moto G5S Plus, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.