Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-08-01 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a little bit better than the Moto G5S Plus, with an 80.4 score against 74.8. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a a little lighter and thinner cellphone than the Moto G5S Plus, even though both were released with only a few months difference. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit superior processor than Moto G5S Plus. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has a greater display density, a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a quite bigger display. Galaxy Note Fan Edition and Motorola Moto G5S Plus both have incredibly similar cameras, because although the Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a camera in the back with a lower 12 mega pixels resolution and a worse video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit more memory for apps and games than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 256 GB. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit better battery lifetime than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a 7% more battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G5S Plus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G5S Plus. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Moto G5S Plus, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.