Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-08-01 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is better than the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, getting a score of 89 against 74.8. Galaxy Note10 is a a lot newer phone, and it's also somewhat thinner and a little lighter than Motorola Moto G5S Plus. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a little sharper display than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution and a bit bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a superior memory for applications and games than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with just a bit better camera than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a lot bigger aperture to take better low light captures and videos. Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a little longer battery performance than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a 17% greater battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto G5S Plus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G5S Plus. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note10, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Moto G5S Plus, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.