Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-01 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is much better than the Moto G5S Plus, having an 86.2 score against 74.8. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is heavier than Moto G5S Plus, it's just a little thinner and also newer. The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a little bit better display than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a little bit inferior count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Moto G5S Plus, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a lower resolution back-facing camera and a lower video definition, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in low light environments.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a very superior battery life than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has a 50% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.