Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2017-08-01 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note3 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, getting a 77.7 score against 74.8. Galaxy Note3's design has the same weight than the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, but it is somewhat thinner. The Moto G5S Plus counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 1920 resolution, the Moto G5S Plus also counts with a bit greater pixels amount in each inch in the display.
Motorola Moto G5S Plus has a little bit more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto G5S Plus also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 128 GB. Moto G5S Plus has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has 4 more cpu cores (although slower) and more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note3's camera is just as good as the Moto G5S Plus one, and although the Galaxy Note3 has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light captures and video, they both have the same video frame rate, the same resolution camera and the same video quality. Samsung Galaxy Note3 has just a bit longer battery performance than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a 7% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.