Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-08-01 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, having a 79.5 score against 74.8. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note7 is older and a bit heavier than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, it's construction is still thinner. The Motorola Moto G5S Plus counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola Moto G5S Plus also has a higher number of cores.
The Galaxy Note7 counts with a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has a bit larger display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per display inch. The Galaxy Note7 counts with a camera that's just as good as the Moto G5S Plus one, because although the Galaxy Note7 has a worse 3840x2160 video quality and a back facing camera with lesser MP resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited situations.
Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with a bit bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy Note7 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 256 GB. Galaxy Note7 has a bit superior battery life than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a 17 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.