Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-08-01 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Metal | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 144.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than Moto G5S Plus, getting an 89.7 score against 74.8. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a incredibly newer and thinner cellphone than Moto G5S Plus, but it is a little bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit better CPU than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a little more vivid screen than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a quite worse pixels quantity per inch of screen, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a superior storage for applications and games than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a superior battery lifetime than Moto G5S Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a very superior camera than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a camera with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite costs a lot more money than the Moto G5S Plus, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.