Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-01 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than Moto G5S Plus's global score of 74.8. Galaxy S20 FE is a way newer and somewhat thinner device than the Moto G5S Plus, although it is heavier. Galaxy S20 FE features a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a bit more vivid display than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen, a larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a better camera than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a worse (4K) video resolution and a camera in the back with a worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S20 FE has a really longer battery performance than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy S20 FE is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G5S Plus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G5S Plus. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Moto G5S Plus, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.