Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2017-08-01 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is way better than the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, having a 93.4 score against 74.8. The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a way newer cellphone, and it is also just a little bit lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G5S Plus. The Galaxy S22 counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has a little bit larger display, a just a bit better pixel quantity in each inch in the display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
Samsung Galaxy S22 features a little better processing power than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S22 features slightly more memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 captures greater photographs and videos than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a way higher video quality, a back camera with a much better resolution and a larger aperture. The Galaxy S22 counts with better battery life than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has a 23% more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S22 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto G5S Plus. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy S22, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.