Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2017-08-01 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is a lot better than Motorola Moto G5S Plus's overall score of 74.8. The Galaxy S22 Ultra body is way newer and just a little bit thinner than Motorola Moto G5S Plus's, although it's much heavier. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has a larger display, a way better resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a bit more pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a superior battery duration than Moto G5S Plus, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots much clearer photos and videos than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a way better video definition, a larger aperture to capture better photos in low-light situations and a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto G5S Plus. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.