Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-08-01 | -- |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | -- |
| 5.93 ounces | -- |
| Gold, Gray and White | -- |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has a general score of 82.6, which is better than the Motorola Moto G5S Plus's general score of 74.8. Galaxy S25 is a much lighter and extremely thinner device than Motorola Moto G5S Plus. The Galaxy S25 features an incredibly better display than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a just a little greater amount of pixels in each inch in the display, a little bit larger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
Galaxy S25 features just a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto G5S Plus counts with an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy S25, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S25 has superior battery lifetime than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3000mAh. Galaxy S25 has a much better camera than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a larger aperture, a way better resolution back camera and a way better video definition.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G5S Plus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G5S Plus. If you want to save some money, you can get the Moto G5S Plus, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.