Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-01 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Black |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, having an 81 score against 74.8. The Galaxy XCover Pro design is noticeably newer than the Motorola Moto G5S Plus's, although it is extremely heavier and a bit thicker. The Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, a quite larger display and a bit better screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Moto G5S Plus. Both have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy XCover Pro features a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a bigger camera aperture for better photos and video in low light situations and a camera in the back with a much better 25 MP resolution.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a much longer battery life than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto G5S Plus. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.