Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-01 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 144.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is better than the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, with a global score of 88.5 against 74.8. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip body is noticeably newer and thinner than the Motorola Moto G5S Plus's, although it is also a little bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better performance than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a little more vivid screen than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a larger display, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a little greater amount of pixels in each screen inch. The Galaxy Z Flip features much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit superior battery duration than Moto G5S Plus, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a camera in the back with a lower resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G5S Plus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G5S Plus. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, else you can save some dollars and buy the Moto G5S Plus, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.