Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-01 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 144.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than the Moto G5S Plus, with a 92.3 score against 74.8. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's body is notably newer and notably thinner, but also a little bit heavier than Moto G5S Plus. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has a bigger display, a little higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution and a quite higher display density.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little better performance than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little better battery lifetime than Moto G5S Plus, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a back facing camera with a worse resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and video.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G5S Plus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G5S Plus. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Moto G5S Plus, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.