Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-01 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 144.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, getting a general score of 94.6 against 74.8. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is noticeably heavier than the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, it's notably thinner and newer. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a just a little worse display density, it also counts with a way bigger display and a better resolution of 1768 x 2208.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a little better processing power than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery size. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes a bit better photographs and videos than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lesser mega-pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in low light environments.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G5S Plus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G5S Plus. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save some dollars and buy the Moto G5S Plus, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.