Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.4 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2018-04-19 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.12 x 2.84 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Blue and Gray | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 308 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has a global score of 80.7, which is better than the Motorola Moto G6 Play's 68.4 overall score. Google Pixel 3 XL's body is thinner but a little heavier than the Motorola Moto G6 Play, and both of them were only released 6 months apart. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a much more vibrant display than Moto G6 Play, because it has a much greater pixel count per screen inch, a way higher 1440 x 2960px resolution and a quite bigger screen.
Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a more powerful processor than Moto G6 Play, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto G6 Play, because although it has a back camera with a lower 12.2 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much better (4K) video definition and a bigger aperture for better captures in poorly lited environments.
The Motorola Moto G6 Play counts with just a bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB. Motorola Moto G6 Play counts with a bit superior battery life than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3430mAh.
The Google Pixel 3 XL is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the Motorola Moto G6 Play.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.