Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2018-04-19 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.12 x 2.84 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue and Gray | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 308 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is much better than the Moto G6 Play's 68.4 score. Galaxy A50 is a newer phone, and it's also just a little lighter and somewhat thinner than Moto G6 Play. The Galaxy A50 counts with a sharper display than Moto G6 Play, because it has a greater pixels density, a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a way bigger memory for apps and games than Moto G6 Play, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy A50 features a greater performance than Moto G6 Play, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A50's battery duration is just as good as the Motorola Moto G6 Play one. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a better camera than Moto G6 Play, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and video and a back camera with a lot better 25 megapixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 costs a little more than Moto G6 Play, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.