Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-19 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Blue and Gray | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the Moto G6 Plus, with a 98 score against 77.5. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's body is newer than Moto G6 Plus's, but it's way heavier and somewhat thicker. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, because it has a quite greater pixel number per inch of screen, a larger screen and a higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little better performance than Moto G6 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G6 Plus, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Moto G6 Plus, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a lot better camera than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting images and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera, a way larger camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.