Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2018-04-19 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blue and Gray | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G6 Plus is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, having a global score of 77.5 against 75.8. The Motorola Moto G6 Plus construction is newer, notably thinner and just a bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a better looking screen than Moto G6 Plus, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel amount per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Moto G6 Plus counts with a bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that allows 72 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Moto G6 Plus counts with a little better performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more cpu cores and 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S7 Active counts with superior battery lifetime than Moto G6 Plus, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Moto G6 Plus counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy S7 Active. Both have the same video frame rates, a same resolution back facing camera, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.