Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-04-19 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Blue and Gray | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 409 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is a bit better than the Moto G6 Plus's general score of 77.5. Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a newer phone than the Moto G6 Plus, but it is noticeably thicker and a lot heavier. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better screen than Moto G6 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher display pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a little better processing power than Moto G6 Plus, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a way better battery lifetime than Moto G6 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3200mAh. Moto G6 Plus counts with a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting images in low light environments and a tinier camera sensor shooting lower quality images and videos, and they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the Moto G6 Plus also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.