Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-19 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blue and Gray | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is a little bit better than the Moto G6 Plus's global score of 77.5. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's construction is newer than the Moto G6 Plus's, but it's thicker and extremely heavier. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro and Motorola Moto G6 Plus feature very similar displays, and although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit larger screen, they both have the same pixel density.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro and Moto G6 Plus have incredibly similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a camera that is very similar to the Motorola Moto G6 Plus one, because although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a lot smaller sensor, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rate, it also counts with a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
Galaxy XCover Pro features longer battery life than Moto G6 Plus, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.