Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-19 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and Gray | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much better than Moto G6 Plus, getting an 88.5 score against 77.5. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's design is newer and just a bit thinner than the Moto G6 Plus's, but it is also a little bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G6 Plus, because it has a little better pixel density, a bit bigger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Moto G6 Plus, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip captures clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting photos and videos in low-light environments, and they both have a 12 mega pixels resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also counts with a larger camera sensor providing a better image quality and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, because it has a 3% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.