Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-04-19 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and Gray | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is much better than Moto G6 Plus, having an 85.6 score against 77.5. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a little heavier than the Moto G6 Plus, it's somewhat thinner and also a lot newer. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little better processing power than Moto G6 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px, a little greater screen pixel density and a quite larger display. Moto G6 Plus has a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a 12 megapixels camera in the back, the Moto G6 Plus also has a larger camera aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited environments.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has slightly more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with just a bit better battery life than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.