Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-19 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and Gray | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is better than the Motorola Moto G6 Plus's overall score of 77.5. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is just a little heavier than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, it's just a little bit thinner and also notably newer. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little sharper screen than Moto G6 Plus, because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px, a bit more pixels per inch of display and a quite larger screen. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a slightly better camera than Moto G6 Plus, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting photos and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a 12 mega-pixels resolution camera, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with a bigger back camera sensor capturing better quality pictures and faster 60 fps video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much better storage for apps and games than Moto G6 Plus, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little longer battery lifetime than Moto G6 Plus, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.