Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-19 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Blue and Gray | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, having a score of 94.6 against 77.5. Even though the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is incredibly heavier than the Motorola Moto G6 Plus, it's somewhat thinner and also noticeably newer. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a little better performance than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a display that's very similar to Moto G6 Plus's screen, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a larger display and a higher 1768 x 2208 resolution. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a slightly better camera than Moto G6 Plus, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and a same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rate and a much bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much longer battery duration than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.