Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2018-04-19 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is better than the Moto G6, with an 82 score against 72.1. The iPhone XR design has the same thickness than Moto G6, but it is somewhat heavier. The Apple iPhone XR features a quite better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G6, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have a 3 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone XR also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
IPhone XR counts with a little sharper screen than Moto G6, because although it has a way worse resolution of 828 x 1792px and a little bit worse pixel count per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite bigger display. The Moto G6 counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone XR, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 128 GB.
The iPhone XR takes a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G6, and although they both have a 0.39 inches sensor, the same (4K) video resolution, a camera with a 12 MP and the same camera aperture, the iPhone XR also has higher video frame rates. The iPhone XR and Moto G6 count with very similar battery performance, although the iPhone XR has just 2942mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G6. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Moto G6, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.