Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2018-04-19 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is much better than the Motorola Moto G6, getting a global score of 81.9 against 72.1. Google Pixel 4 is a newer phone, and it is also just a bit thinner and a little bit lighter than Motorola Moto G6. Google Pixel 4 has a bit superior processor than Moto G6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit better display than Moto G6, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Google Pixel 4 also has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a little bit better number of pixels per inch of display. The Google Pixel 4 features a camera that's very similar to Motorola Moto G6's camera, and although the Google Pixel 4 has a back facing camera with more MP and a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in low-light situations, they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a same size back-facing camera sensor and the same video quality.
Moto G6 counts with a little bit more storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB. Motorola Moto G6 counts with just a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 7 percent larger battery size.
The Google Pixel 4 costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G6, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.