Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2018-04-19 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a score of 82.9, which is much better than the Moto G6's 72.1 general score. The Google Pixel 4 XL is a newer and a little thinner phone than the Moto G6, but it is somewhat heavier. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G6, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with just a bit better screen than Moto G6, because it has a little larger display, a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and more pixels per inch of display. Moto G6 and Google Pixel 4 XL both have quite similar cameras, and although the Google Pixel 4 XL has a better resolution back facing camera and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and video, they both have a same size camera sensor, the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate.
The Motorola Moto G6 counts with a bit bigger storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with better battery lifetime than Moto G6, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto G6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G6. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Moto G6, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.