Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-04-19 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a general score of 82.5, which is better than Moto G6's score of 72.1. Even though the LG V30S ThinQ and Moto G6 were only released with a couple of months difference, the LG V30S ThinQ is a bit lighter and thinner. The LG V30S ThinQ has a slightly better display than Moto G6, because it has a better pixels density, a little bit larger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
LG V30S ThinQ has a bit better performance than Moto G6, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory. LG V30S ThinQ features a much better memory for games and applications than Moto G6, because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a little longer battery life than Motorola Moto G6, because it has a 3300mAh battery size. LG V30S ThinQ shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Moto G6, because although it has a tinier sensor, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a back camera with a way better 16 mega pixels resolution and a larger aperture for better low light photography.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G6. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy LG V30S ThinQ, else you can save some money and get the Moto G6, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.