Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2018-04-19 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is much better than the Moto G6's 72.1 general score. Even though the LG V35 ThinQ and Moto G6 were released with only 2 months difference, the LG V35 ThinQ is thinner and a little bit lighter. LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better looking screen than Moto G6, because it has a higher screen pixel density, a little bit bigger display and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little better processing power than Motorola Moto G6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG V35 ThinQ has a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G6, because it has more internal memory and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ features a bit superior battery performance than Moto G6, because it has a 3300mAh battery size. The LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better camera than Moto G6, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor which offers a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a larger diafragm aperture and a lot better resolution back facing camera.
LG V35 ThinQ costs more money than Moto G6, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.