Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2018-04-19 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is much better than the Motorola Moto G6, with an 87.1 score against 72.1. LG Velvet is a notably newer and a bit thinner phone than Motorola Moto G6, although it's also a little heavier. The LG Velvet and Moto G6 both have incredibly similar displays, because although the LG Velvet has a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a larger display.
LG Velvet has a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto G6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG Velvet also has a larger amount of RAM. LG Velvet features a much better camera than Moto G6, and although they both have the same video resolution, a same size aperture and the same video frame rates, the LG Velvet also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and pictures and a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
The LG Velvet has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G6, because it has 96 GB more internal storage and a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet has a superior battery life than Moto G6, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The LG Velvet costs more than the Motorola Moto G6, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.