Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-04-19 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Meteor grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a score of 80.3, which is better than Moto G6's 72.1 score. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW construction is extremely newer, but just a bit thicker and noticeably heavier than Moto G6. Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G6 has a bit sharper screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with much more storage for games and applications than Moto G6, because it has an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB and 64 GB internal memory.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW takes much clearer pictures and videos than Moto G6, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same video definition, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a back camera with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution, a lot bigger sensor and higher video frame rate. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a way better battery life than Moto G6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G6. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Moto G6, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.