Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| 2018-04-19 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 9 PureView is a little bit better than Moto G6, with a 76.4 score against 72.1. Nokia 9 PureView's body is newer and a bit thinner, but also just a bit heavier than the Moto G6. The Nokia 9 PureView has a slightly better screen than Motorola Moto G6, because it has a bit larger display, a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2880px resolution.
Nokia 9 PureView counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Moto G6, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Nokia 9 PureView has just a little better hardware performance than Moto G6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 9 PureView also has more RAM.
The Nokia 9 PureView has a bit better battery duration than Motorola Moto G6, because it has 3320mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Motorola Moto G6 counts with a slightly better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same resolution back camera and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G6 also has a larger sensor which gives a better image and video quality.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G6. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Nokia 9 PureView, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Moto G6, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.