Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-04-19 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G6's global score of 72.1. Nubia Red Magic 3S is a newer device than Motorola Moto G6, but it is thicker and noticeably heavier. The nubia Red Magic 3S and Moto G6 both count with extremely similar screens, because although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a quite lower pixels count in each display inch, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a larger screen.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Moto G6, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a greater performance than Motorola Moto G6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 9 GB more RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a much longer battery lifetime than Moto G6, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a lot better camera than Moto G6, because it has a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality, a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, a much higher video quality and a bigger camera aperture to take better images in poorly lited environments.
Although nubia Red Magic 3S is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G6. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy nubia Red Magic 3S, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Moto G6, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.