Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-04-19 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G has a score of 79.4, which is much better than the Moto G6's 72.1 general score. Even though Galaxy A35 5G is a lot heavier than Moto G6, it's just a little bit thinner and also notably newer. The Galaxy A35 5G has just a bit better display than Moto G6, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bigger display.
Moto G6 features a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has 3 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G6, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a much better battery life than Moto G6, because it has a 67% more battery size. The Galaxy A35 5G features a much better camera than Moto G6, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same video resolution and a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a much larger back camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and photographs and a back camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.