Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2018-04-19 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is better than Motorola Moto G6, with an 83.8 score against 72.1. The Galaxy A50 is a newer phone, and it is also just a bit lighter and just a bit thinner than Motorola Moto G6. The Galaxy A50 has a little faster CPU than Moto G6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A50 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G6 and the Galaxy A50 both feature incredibly similar displays, because although the Galaxy A50 has a bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little larger display. Galaxy A50 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Moto G6, because although it has a tinier sensor giving a lower image quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a larger aperture and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
Galaxy A50 features a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G6, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50 has improved battery performance than Moto G6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 costs a little more than the Motorola Moto G6, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.