Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-19 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is much better than Moto G6, getting a global score of 90.8 against 72.1. Although the Galaxy A51 5G is incredibly newer than the Moto G6, it's just a little bit thicker and heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a little better performance than Moto G6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G and Moto G6 feature extremely similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a quite lower display density, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Galaxy A51 5G features a superior memory for applications and games than Moto G6, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A51 5G captures better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G6, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for shooting photographs or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a way larger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality and a back facing camera with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution.
Galaxy A51 5G features a much longer battery performance than Moto G6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A51 5G costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto G6, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.