Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2018-04-19 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A6 is just a bit better than Moto G6, having a overall score of 75.8 against 72.1. The Galaxy A6 is a a little bit thinner and just a little lighter cellphone than Moto G6, even when they were only released with a few months difference. Moto G6 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A6. They have 3 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
Moto G6 counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a bit larger screen, a better display pixel density and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels. The Motorola Moto G6 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and a camera with lot less mega-pixels, it also counts with a bigger sensor which offers a better photo and video quality and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy A6 features a bigger storage for applications and games than Moto G6, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A6 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 400 GB. Galaxy A6 and Motorola Moto G6 count with similar battery performance.
Galaxy A6 not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.