Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-04-19 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 has a general score of 76.9, which is slightly better than the Moto G6's 72.1 general score. Galaxy A70's construction is newer and just a bit thinner, but a bit heavier than Moto G6. Galaxy A70 counts with a bit faster processor than Moto G6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A70 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Motorola Moto G6 counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little better screen pixels density. The Moto G6 counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Moto G6 also counts with a larger sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G6, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A70 features a way better battery life than Moto G6, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy A70 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G6. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto G6, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.