Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-04-19 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is way better than Moto G6, getting a general score of 92.9 against 72.1. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's design has the same thickness than Moto G6, but it is heavier. Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit superior CPU than Moto G6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM.
The Moto G6 and the Galaxy A71 5G UW have really similar screens, because although the Galaxy A71 5G UW has a just a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger display. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much greater storage for games and applications than Moto G6, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G6, because it has a 50 percent larger battery capacity. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a greater camera than Motorola Moto G6, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video quality and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a lot larger sensor and a back camera with a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more than Moto G6, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.